Rectal foreign bodies. An Updated review

Authors

  • Ignacia Santiago Hermosilla Interno Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile
  • Jasmín Peña Zacconi Interno Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile
  • Lucas González Johnson Interno Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile
  • Eduardo Vicuña Viera Interno Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile

Abstract

Introduction: Rectal foreign bodies (REC) have increased in incidence in recent years, however, there are few epidemiological data to this date. Its management generally represents a challenge for surgeons due to the variability of clinical presentations. The goal of this review is to describe and analyze national and international publications on CER during the last decade. Materials and methods: A bibliographic review was carried out in Medline (PubMed) and Scholar Google databases, including publications from 2010 to 2021. Results: 29 results were obtained, eliminating those focused on extra-rectal foreign bodies and rectal lesions of other etiologies. There is a male predominance in CER cases, with a ratio of up to 28: 1 and a higher incidence between 20-40 years. 35.8% of the cases were secondary to sexual stimulation, 50.6% had no reported cause and 5.2% were due to third-party aggression. The cardinal symptoms are anal pain or constipation. Most CERs can be diagnosed by abdominal and pelvic radiographs (Rx), however, a negative Rx does not rule it out. Multiple extraction techniques are described, depending on the type of object and the risk or suspicion of complications; being the most frequent ones sphincter and / or anal mucosa lacerations, intestinal obstruction and perforation. Discussion: The bibliography regarding CER is currently scarce, however, its incidence is expected to increase; therefore, it is important that health care professionals take into consideration its diagnostic possibility and learn management options.

Keywords:

Rectum, Foreing Bodies, Emergencies

References

Ploner M, Gardetto A, Ploner F, Scharl M, Shoap S, Bäcker HC. Foreign rectal body – systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2020;83(1):61–5.

Rodríguez TR, Claudio C. Tratamiento del cuerpo extraño rectal en un Servicio de Urgencia. Rev Cir (Mex) [Internet]. 2019;71(6):518–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.35687/s2452-45492019006385

Montoya Botero J, Medellín Abueta A, Obando Rodallega A, Cardona Gaviria H, Martínez Jaramillo C, Mateus Barbosa L et al. Enfoque del manejo de cuerpos extraños colorectales: Revisión de la literatura. Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología. 2018;33(1):49.

Tupe, C. L., & Pham, T. V. (2016). Anorectal Complaints in the Emergency Department. Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 34(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2015.12.013

Ayantunde AA. Approach to the diagnosis and management of retained rectal foreign bodies:

Clinical update. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(1):13–20.

Pinto A, Miele V, Pinto F, Mizio V Di, Panico MR, Muzj C, et al. Rectal Foreign Bodies: Imaging Assessment and Medicolegal Aspects. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI2015;36(1):88–93. Disponible en:http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2014.11.002

Ologun, G. O., Stevenson, Y., Cagir, B., Granet, P., & McPhail, P. (2018). Successful Retrieval of a Retained Rectal Foreign Body in the Emergency Department. Cureus, 10(1), e2025. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2025

Lohsiriwat V. (2016). Anorectal emergencies. World journal of gastroenterology, 22(26), 5867–5878. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5867

Odagiri H, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Iizuka T, Kaise M. Difference in outcomes of rectal foreign bodies between males and females: A retrospective analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. Digestion. 2015;92(3):165–70.

Kim, J. H., Um, E., Jung, S. M., Shin, Y. C., Jung, S. W., Kim, J. I., Heo, T. G., Lee, M. S., Jun, H., & Choi, P. W. (2020). The Management of Retained Rectal Foreign Body. Annals of coloproctology, 36(5), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.03.1

Sajjad, H., & Paish, L. M. (2020). Rectum Foreign Body Removal. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.

Kokemohr P, Haeder L, Frömling FJ, Landwehr P, Jähne J. Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A 10-year single-center experience. Innov Surg Sci. 2020;2(2):89–95.

Anderson, K. L., & Dean, A. J. (2011). Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract and anorectal emergencies. Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 29(2), 369–ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2011.01.009 14. Zhao, B., Roper, M., Tomassi, M., Wenger, S. and Klaristenfeld, D., 2021. Techniques for the extraction of high rectal foreign bodies by transanal minimally invasive surgery. Techniques in Coloproctology,

Robinson, E. C., Roy, D., & Driver, B. E. (2018). Deflate to Extricate: A Technique for Rectal Foreign Body Removal of Inflatable Ball. The Journal of emergency medicine, 54(2), e23–e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.015

Cawich, S. O., Thomas, D. A., Mohammed, F., Bobb, N. J., Williams, D., & Naraynsingh, V. (2017). A Management Algorithm for Retained Rectal Foreign Bodies. American journal of men's health, 11(3), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316680929

Bak, Y., Merriam, M., Neff, M., & Berg, D. A. (2013). Novel approach to rectal foreign body extraction. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17(2), 342–345.

https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13654754534233

Shaban, Y., Elkbuli, A., Ovakimyan, V., Wobing, R., Boneva, D., McKenney, M., & Hai, S. (2019). Rectal foreign body causing perforation: Case report and literature review. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 47, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.005

Yildiz, S. Y., Kendirci, M., Akbulut, S., Ciftci, A., Turgut, H. T., & Hengirmen, S. (2013). Colorectal emergencies associated with penetrating or retained foreign bodies. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-25

Najah H, Pocard M. Laparoscopic repair of rectal foreign body perforation without protective colostomy (with video). J Chir Viscerale [Internet]. 2015;152(1):65–6. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.09.009